On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:24:53 -0500 DRC <dcomman...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> We've had this discussion before, and the reasons we chose SVN are: (a) > SourceForge supports it, so we can keep the repository on our SF page, > (b) it was a system we all knew how to use, and (c) it's a system that > most people in the OSS community know how to use as well. (a) no longer applies as Sourceforge supports git these days actually. I'd really like to use git here as I agree with Adam that it is a far superior tool. But I also agree with DRC. If changing tools causes one of our (few) developers to be unable to contribute, then it is not the right time to change. I believe that git is something that every free software developer needs to learn eventually though as a lot of projects are moving to it, and I do hope you'll find the time to learn it soon. Rgds -- Pierre Ossman OpenSource-based Thin Client Technology System Developer Telephone: +46-13-21 46 00 Cendio AB Web: http://www.cendio.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
