I do all of my pre-release builds on CentOS 4.8. Can you try my binaries? http://www.virtualgl.org/DeveloperInfo/TigerVNCPreReleases
These are built using gcc4/g++4 and the Xorg 7.4 code base (unix/build-xorg -version 7.4) On 3/16/11 10:32 AM, Brian Hinz wrote: > I get identical results with the 1_1 branch. Can anyone else verify this? > > Thanks, > -brian > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Brian Hinz <bph...@jhu.edu > <mailto:bph...@jhu.edu>> wrote: > > Ah, hadn't seen that... I'll try that and let you know. > > Thanks, > -brian > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:38 PM, DRC > <dcomman...@users.sourceforge.net > <mailto:dcomman...@users.sourceforge.net>> wrote: > > The trunk is quite unstable right now. I suggest building from > the 1.1 > branch. > > > On 3/15/11 10:19 AM, Brian Hinz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Can anyone confirm whether or not the "legacy" build is working > from the > > current svn trunk on RHEL4? I was able to build and use r4237 > > successfully, but while I can build r4324, the resulting binary > bails > > out on assertions or segfaults (depending on the arguments to Xvnc) > > without leaving too many clues as to what's causing it. I've tried > > using strace, ltrace, and gdb to generate some debug info but > so far the > > only helpful info that I have is that the last message > displayed by Xvnc > > is the "client pixel format ..." message generated by VNCSConnST: > > > > Xvnc :2 -query localhost -once -SecurityTypes None -NeverShared > -rfbport > > 5902 -geometry 1280x800 -depth 24 -pixdepths 8 24 > > ... > > VNCSConnST: Client pixel format depth 24 (32bpp) > little-endian rgb888 > > Segmentation fault > > > > Xvnc :2 -query localhost -once -SecurityTypes None -NeverShared > -rfbport > > 5902 -geometry 1280x800 -depth 8 > > ... > > VNCSConnST: Client pixel format depth 8 (8bpp) color-map > > *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid next size (normal): > > 0x0000000000ac0f80 *** > > Abort > > > > It's possible that this is due to system changes on the build > host, but > > the binary from r4237 still works fine (unfortunately I blew > away the > > build environment...). If anyone has done a legacy build on > RHEL4u8 and > > can confirm that it works, I'd appreciate it. FWIW, my build > args are: > > > > setenv CC /usr/bin/gcc4 > > setenv CXX /usr/bin/g++4 (actually tried it with gcc3 and gcc4, > but gcc4 > > most recently) > > autoreconf -fiv > > ./configure --enable-pam --enable-gnutls--with-included-zlib > > --with-libtool=/usr/bin/libtool > > sh unix/build-xorg init -version 7.4 -static > > sh unix/build-xorg build -version 7.4 -static --enable-pam > > --enable-gnutls --with-included-zlib > --with-libtool=/usr/bin/libtool > > > > Thanks, > > -brian > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Colocation vs. Managed Hosting > > A question and answer guide to determining the best fit > > for your organization - today and in the future. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tigervnc-devel mailing list > > Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > <mailto:Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Colocation vs. Managed Hosting > A question and answer guide to determining the best fit > for your organization - today and in the future. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d > _______________________________________________ > Tigervnc-devel mailing list > Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > <mailto:Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Colocation vs. Managed Hosting > A question and answer guide to determining the best fit > for your organization - today and in the future. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tigervnc-devel mailing list > Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
