Thanks. Do you have issues with the x86_64 build? I had to grab the
autoconf macros for pkg-config from RHEL5 because PKG_CHECK_EXISTS isn't
provided with the older version shipped with RHEL4. I also had to build
with NASM=/usr/bin/yasm (no big deal, but could be part of the problem?)
This was on a fresh install of CentOS 4.8 with "everything" installed.
-brian
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 4:49 PM, DRC wrote:
> I do all of my pre-release builds on CentOS 4.8. Can you try my binaries?
>
> http://www.virtualgl.org/DeveloperInfo/TigerVNCPreReleases
>
> These are built using gcc4/g++4 and the Xorg 7.4 code base
> (unix/build-xorg -version 7.4)
>
>
> On 3/16/11 10:32 AM, Brian Hinz wrote:
> > I get identical results with the 1_1 branch. Can anyone else verify
> this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -brian
> >
> >
> >
> > Ah, hadn't seen that... I'll try that and let you know.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -brian
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:38 PM, DRC
> >
> > The trunk is quite unstable right now. I suggest building from
> > the 1.1
> > branch.
> >
> >
> > On 3/15/11 10:19 AM, Brian Hinz wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Can anyone confirm whether or not the "legacy" build is working
> > from the
> > > current svn trunk on RHEL4? I was able to build and use r4237
> > > successfully, but while I can build r4324, the resulting binary
> > bails
> > > out on assertions or segfaults (depending on the arguments to
> Xvnc)
> > > without leaving too many clues as to what's causing it. I've
> tried
> > > using strace, ltrace, and gdb to generate some debug info but
> > so far the
> > > only helpful info that I have is that the last message
> > displayed by Xvnc
> > > is the "client pixel format ..." message generated by
> VNCSConnST:
> > >
> > > Xvnc :2 -query localhost -once -SecurityTypes None -NeverShared
> > -rfbport
> > > 5902 -geometry 1280x800 -depth 24 -pixdepths 8 24
> > > ...
> > > VNCSConnST: Client pixel format depth 24 (32bpp)
> > little-endian rgb888
> > > Segmentation fault
> > >
> > > Xvnc :2 -query localhost -once -SecurityTypes None -NeverShared
> > -rfbport
> > > 5902 -geometry 1280x800 -depth 8
> > > ...
> > > VNCSConnST: Client pixel format depth 8 (8bpp) color-map
> > > *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid next size (normal):
> > > 0x0000000000ac0f80 ***
> > > Abort
> > >
> > > It's possible that this is due to system changes on the build
> > host, but
> > > the binary from r4237 still works fine (unfortunately I blew
> > away the
> > > build environment...). If anyone has done a legacy build on
> > RHEL4u8 and
> > > can confirm that it works, I'd appreciate it. FWIW, my build
> > args are:
> > >
> > > setenv CC /usr/bin/gcc4
> > > setenv CXX /usr/bin/g++4 (actually tried it with gcc3 and gcc4,
> > but gcc4
> > > most recently)
> > > autoreconf -fiv
> > > ./configure --enable-pam --enable-gnutls--with-included-zlib
> > > --with-libtool=/usr/bin/libtool
> > > sh unix/build-xorg init -version 7.4 -static
> > > sh unix/build-xorg build -version 7.4 -static --enable-pam
> > > --enable-gnutls --with-included-zlib
> > --with-libtool=/usr/bin/libtool
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -brian
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
> > > A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
> > > for your organization - today and in the future.
> > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Tigervnc-devel mailing list
> > > Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > <mailto:Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
> > A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
> > for your organization - today and in the future.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tigervnc-devel mailing list
> > Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > <mailto:Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
> > A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
> > for your organization - today and in the future.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tigervnc-devel mailing list
> > Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
> A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
> for your organization - today and in the future.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
> _______________________________________________
> Tigervnc-devel mailing list
> Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Tigervnc-devel mailing list
Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
