I'm sorry to be such a PITA, but could you post your exact build script?
Even with NASM 2.07 I get the same results. The only other thing I've come
across is that if I set the encoding type in the viewer to hextile, rather
than autoselect the server bails out with:
VNCSConnST: Client pixel format depth 24 (32bpp) little-endian rgb888
Xvnc:
/projects/bphinz/apps/tigervnc/1_1/common/rfb/hextileEncodeBetter.h:138:
void rfb::HextileTile32::analyse(): Assertion `m_tile && m_width &&
m_height' failed.
Note that "/projects/bphinz/apps/tigervnc/1_1" is the source dir. Aside
from adding "export CC=/usr/bin/gcc4", "export CXX=/usr/bin/g++4", and
"--with-fontdir=/usr/lib/X11/fonts --disable-ipv6" to the XORGCFGFLAGS line
in ${source_dir}/unix/buid-xorg, the only change that I made was to add a
patch to the ${source_dir}/unix/xorg-7.4-patches dir which concatenates the
m4 macros for PKG_PROG_PKGCONFIG, PKG_CHECK_EXISTS, _PKG_CONFIG,
_PKG_SHORT_ERRORS_SUPPORTED, and PKG_CHECK_MODULES to
${build_dir}/xorg/xserver/acinclude.m4. Without this, configure fails in
the xserver with:
...
./configure: line 19663: PKG_PROG_PKG_CONFIG: command not found
checking for flex... flex
...
...
checking for backtrace in -lc... yes
./configure: line 26029: syntax error near unexpected token `libdrm,'
./configure: line 26029: ` PKG_CHECK_EXISTS(libdrm, DRI=yes,
DRI=no)'
...
(I'm curious why you don't see these same failures?)
Otherwise, I just ran:
cd ${source_dir}
autoreconf -fiv
cd ${build_dir}
sh ${source_dir}/unix/build-xorg init -version 7.4
sh ${source_dir}/unix/build-xorg build -version 7.4 -static --enable-pam
--enable-gnutls
Thanks,
-brian
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:42 PM, DRC wrote:
> YASM is probably the largest part of your problem. It is known not to
> produce correct code when building the 64-bit version of libjpeg-turbo.
> Earlier versions of NASM had the same problem (you have to use NASM
> 2.05 and later.) Read BUILDING.txt for instructions on how to build a
> NASM 2.05 RPM from the SRPM.
>
> As far as autotools, I'm using the unaltered RPMs from CentOS 4.8.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
> A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
> for your organization - today and in the future.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
> _______________________________________________
> Tigervnc-devel mailing list
> Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Tigervnc-devel mailing list
Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
