On 5/21/14 7:32 AM, Pierre Ossman wrote: > My biggest current gripe is that it's annoyingly slow far too often. > But the move is not just about avoiding the bad, it's a lot about > getting improvements. Github's (and to a large extent git's) way of > working is a lot more friendly to casual contributors. Sourceforge has > tried to copy some of this by also having forking and pull requests. > But the system is buggy and unreliable. And I can't say I'm surprised > given sourceforge's track record...
Again, not arguing, but just trying to understand the situation fully. SourceForge supports git, so are you saying that github offers features above and beyond just plain git? Or could the features you're describing be obtained by simply moving from SVN to git within SourceForge as well? It hasn't ever been slow for me, but then again, I'm located in the same country as the SF servers. From my point of view, SourceForge is primarily a CMS. Lots of projects use it for some functions and host other functions, like source management and bug tracking, elsewhere. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Time is money. Stop wasting it! Get your web API in 5 minutes. www.restlet.com/download http://p.sf.net/sfu/restlet _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
