I can't see any issues with the release candidate but it would be nice
for windoze users to include "zip" distro - also wouldn't it be nice
for users to also release binary distros and not just the source
distro?
Couple of other minor points:
1) CHANGES.txt says "Unreleased changes (0.1-dev)" rather than
indicating the 0.1-Incubating release
2) Usual convention I've seen on other projects is to use "tags" for
releases and "branches" for alternative development branches:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/tika/branches/
3) The IPMC will probably ask to see a RAT report - the site build
includes one (and it looks fine) - so might be a good idea to either
stage the site built from that tag or just produce a text one manually
- I have produced a text one from the 0.1-incubating source distro
here if that makes life easier:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/Tika-0.1/
Niall
On Dec 24, 2007 4:19 AM, Chris Mattmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I have posted a candidate for the Apache Tika 0.1-incubating release at
>
> http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-tika-0.1-incubating/rc1/
>
> See the included CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents and latest
> changes. The release was made from the 0.1-incubating trunk.
>
> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache Tika 0.1-incubating. The
> vote is open for the next 72 hours. Only votes from Tika committers are
> binding, but everyone is welcome to check the release candidate and voice
> their approval or disapproval. The vote passes if at least three binding +1
> votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache Tika 0.1-incubating
> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris
