Thanks for that information, Chris. The +1 was for the quoted text, that we vote on something that has been frozen, for the reasons given by others.
Regards, Keith Chris Mattmann wrote: > > Hi Keith, > > Was this a +1 to the RC2 for Tika that I just posted? > > W.r.t level of confidence, on Nutch, we (loosely) do the following: > > 1. Verify the .asc and the .md5 sum actually describes the delivered > (src+bin) code > 2. Run build/unit tests > 3. Small test of the software (if not covered by unit tests) > > Thanks! > > Cheers, > Chris > > > > > On 12/28/07 12:32 PM, "Keith R. Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> +1. >> >> BTW, I may not have the time to thoroughly review the release candidates. >> What level of confidence do you suggest as a criterion for voting? (In >> other words, if I take a brief look, and it looks ok, would you like me >> to >> vote +1, or only vote +1 if I review the release candidate thoroughly?) >> >> Happy Holidays and New Year to everyone, >> - Keith > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Release-Candidate--0.1-incubating-tp14484515p14533738.html Sent from the Apache Tika - Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
