Hi Keith, Was this a +1 to the RC2 for Tika that I just posted?
W.r.t level of confidence, on Nutch, we (loosely) do the following: 1. Verify the .asc and the .md5 sum actually describes the delivered (src+bin) code 2. Run build/unit tests 3. Small test of the software (if not covered by unit tests) Thanks! Cheers, Chris On 12/28/07 12:32 PM, "Keith R. Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1. > > BTW, I may not have the time to thoroughly review the release candidates. > What level of confidence do you suggest as a criterion for voting? (In > other words, if I take a brief look, and it looks ok, would you like me to > vote +1, or only vote +1 if I review the release candidate thoroughly?) > > Happy Holidays and New Year to everyone, > - Keith > > > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >> >> On Dec 27, 2007 2:59 PM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> ...What I'm concerned about is that we >>> don't have a release vote on something that still gets modified before >>> it gets published.... >> >> Agreed, and that's why I like it when the md5 digests of the artifacts >> that we vote on are included in the vote threads. >> >> This allow people to check that they're using the exact same stuff >> that we vote on. >> >> -Bertrand >> >> ______________________________________________ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cognizant Development Engineer Early Detection Research Network Project _________________________________________________ Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA Office: 171-266B Mailstop: 171-246 _______________________________________________________ Disclaimer: The opinions presented within are my own and do not reflect those of either NASA, JPL, or the California Institute of Technology.
