spaetz wrote: > and I am a bit short-fused.
so am I at 2:30 am when things just don't work _at_ _all_. > i appreciate that you attempt to test my code and I am grateful for that. That is what I was referring to. For a public(!) beta test it is just a no-go when the installation instructions are wrong. Then came the return code for "unknown user" (different that the old server, and so not displayed by the client), and then the 500-issue. Quite a build-up for something with installation instructions of "run this patch and enter your OSM credentials"... > On the issue of authentication, do you have a special char in your username like an @-sign or so? It should work theoretically, but I am not sure as I can only create so many test accounts on the OSM server... Nothing weird, my display name is just "Henry Loenwind" ;-) However, I'm a Software Architect, and I get to review source code every day. With time, you'll get to know types of bugs, and I assure you, the type "I assumed I could re-use that return value without checking it at all" is one of the worst*... cu Henry *) Ok, the one where the coder stored a giant non-serializeable object in a local variable, and a global variable, and an object property, and in the state database was worse. _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tilesathome
