On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Dirk-Lüder Kreie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Florian Lohoff schrieb: > >> Yes - the goal should be that the bottleneck to always be the clients to >> keep them busy all the time but this needs more work to be done and the >> empty prio4 brought everything out of balance. >> > > This is virtually impossible, as you can always throw more clients at the > problem. > Where is the bottleneck now? As you mentioned earlier, the OSM API was before, but with Flo's ROMA setup, is that situation better? Is the TAH server setup (NFS-backed database tables) a problem?
_______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
