On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, spaetz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 07:46:26PM +0200, Dirk St?cker wrote: >> Then make the 1 --> 2 rewriting depending on the age of the tile? > > And what would apply in what case? make it 2 if the tile is older and > keep it at 1 if its a new one?
No. If the last tile is very old, then accept it at prio 1 even if you would change it to 2 automatically. But probably this is a theoretical question, when all the currently unrendered tiles are rendered at least once. > I don't have a problem at introdocing 2500 more priority levels if that > makes people happy. I just fail to see the benefit. THere is no way to > "force bulk requests to be priority >10" as the server has no way of > differentiating between a bulk request and a person pressing r on one > tile in informationfreeway. the calls look the same. Yes, that's why I would add such a bulk request. When using POST, then a larger number of request can be transported at once: - Reduce server load due to lots of requests - Automatically have a low priority And a bit of programming/scripting is required thus reducing the misuse potential :-) Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available) _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
