spaetz wrote: > On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 05:35:44PM +0200, Maarten Deen wrote: >> spaetz wrote: >> >> > I set the opacity of the oceantiles layer to 0.5 now, see .e.g. >> > http://server.tah.openstreetmap.org/Browse/slippy/?zoom=12&lat=51.53447&lon=3.66425&layers=BT >> >> Looks good. >> >> > mixed tiles are still shown as water tiles, though. No idea what would be >> > best in that case. >> >> Why not have land=green, mixed=grey, water=blue, like the oceantiles.png? > > Elaborated in a separate mail: It's just so much easier to let the > oceantiles.dat part of the tile serving plugin do it's job and show land/sea > tiles. Having it show different tiles (say in different colors) would imply > making the tile server more complicated.
Ok, missed that one. >> BTW: I'm only now noticing this: there are a whole lot of mixed tiles in the >> Netherlands. Seems someone marked everything with a river as mixed. >> My opinion is that a tile not touched by a coastline is not mixed. And >> rivers >> are no coastlines. Am I correct? > > This is how I would expect it too. But take care, often people tag rivers > coming from the sea as coastline for quite a bit into the land. Therefore > changing the oceantiles status can really imply checking the data. Rivers like the Meuse up to Maastricht? If the person who did this reads here: please don't. Maarten _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
