Matthias Julius wrote: > Yes, especially servers. I suspect there are some people here (myself > included) who would be willing to act as admin if they were given a > server. The good thing is that hosting the maplint layer should have > a lot lower requirements compared to hosting all of tah. That might > open up some opportunities. Can you do a du -s on the maplint > storage?
209G maplint_12 So that would offload some of the disk usage. > According to the munin graphs for tah there is almost 4 times as much > outgoing traffic compared to the incoming traffic. And I assume that > the outgoing traffic is mostly tile serving and the incoming traffic > mostly tile uploads. Or are there other things running on that box? Munin displays total network traffic, I think and that box hosts a picture hosting site, a busy forum and various other stuff, so I wouldn't trust munin on this one. > I would prefer to keep those things out of the client. This keeps the > client simple and we don't need to worry about propagating config > changes when a layer moves to a different server. Also, when a single > server handles all uploads it can more easily keep track of the render > queue and the secondary servers don't need to mess with user > authentication. Would be easy if we could e.g. NFS mount the remote location, but as the servers are likely to be network distant (and at least the future one at ETH will most likely be heavily firewalled) this will not be feasible. spaetz _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
