From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] FW: Bulletin C number 30 Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 20:09:26 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hej Poul-Henning, > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Doug Hogarth" writes: > > >We are finally going to have a leap second again (first one since I bought > >my 5071A over five years ago)... > > It also means that the attempt to prevent leapseconds before they > do more damage failed... Would the alternative be much better? > It even means we get to see how much damage they'll make... Considering how "off" some systems are in time, a leapsecond more or less will not make much of a difference. Cheers, Magnus _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
