In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Magnus Danielson write s: >> >We are finally going to have a leap second again (first one since I bought >> >my 5071A over five years ago)... >> >> It also means that the attempt to prevent leapseconds before they >> do more damage failed... > >Would the alternative be much better?
Lets not restart that discussion :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
