No problem at this end. I looked at the time stamps on the posts and
thought, "By not going back and checking my ancient memories before
writing, I must have sent Rex (and maybe other, too) off on a wild goose
chase till the wee hours looking for a connection that just wasn't there."
Rex's detailed and accurate information has been most appreciated at this
end.
Having traced around the board myself, I am well aware of how much
painstaking
effort -- and talent -- was needed to come up with it.
I get cranky after being sent on wild goose chases into the wee hours, too.
Jim
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 00:50:06 -0700, Rex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 23:51:06 -0500, James Meek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 01:13:50 -0700, Rex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Give me some *facts* with new information or shut up. You are beginning
to annoy me.
[etc.]
Pardon me for failing to thank you more effusively in my rushed reply.
But as I wrote, "Many thanks for this info. I was reluctant to power up
the whole board, before doing further circuit tracing" (which I hadn't
time to do).
That post I made was one I regretted almost immediately after I hit
send. It was late and I had consumed a few beverages. Having stated that
minor justification, I was out of line and way over reacting with my
aggressive tone.
Apologies to James, and for just being a bad citizen of the group.
-Rex
--
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
