Hi John:

Is there any data on how the Reflock II does as the basis of a GPSDO compared 
to other ones?

Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
w/Java http://www.PRC68.com
w/o Java http://www.pacificsites.com/~brooke/PRC68COM.shtml
http://www.precisionclock.com



John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
> You might look at using a Reflock II
> (http://www.tapr.org/kits_reflock_ii) to discipline a 32MHz VCXO from
> your 10MHz.  Unfortunately, the Clock-Block phase noise is nowhere near
> good enough to use for an RF application, so that's not an option. :-(
> 
> 73,
> John
> ----
> 
> Bruce Lane said the following on 04/21/2007 02:26 PM:
> 
>>Fellow time-clockers,
>>
>>      I have an interesting (if a bit annoying) situation. I would like to 
>> use one of my existing GPS standards to improve stability on one of my HF 
>> transceivers. The problem is that said transceiver, for reasons unknown to 
>> me, uses a 32MHz reference oscillator.
>>
>>      The highest GPS-lock frequency I have available is 10MHz. Suggestions 
>> for using this to produce a 32MHz reference would be welcome, as my skills 
>> for this kind of design are a bit rusty.
>>
>>      Thanks much.
>>
>>
>>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>Bruce Lane, Owner & Head Hardware Heavy,
>>Blue Feather Technologies -- http://www.bluefeathertech.com
>>kyrrin (at) bluefeathertech do/t c=o=m
>>"If Salvador Dali had owned a computer, would it have been equipped with 
>>surreal ports?"
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>time-nuts mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/maian/listinfo/time-nuts
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> 

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

Reply via email to