Dr Bruce Griffiths said the following on 04/21/2007 06:59 PM:
 multiple of the PPS frequency.
> 
> Thus while the REFLOCK II is better than nothing its performance will 
> fall far below a well designed real GPSDO in this application.
> It will work much better for locking to higher frequencies where an XOR 
> or phase detector with similar resolution is employed.

Absolutely agreed.  The Reflock II was really designed to lock high(er)
frequency oscillators to low(er) frequency references.  The PPS input
capability was a sort of "well, yeah, we can do that" and for some
applications it's adequate -- but it's in no way intended to replace a
real GPSDO.

John


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

Reply via email to