); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bruce I find this an interesting thread.......one maybe naive thought...... "it would be nice to have a"too-good" stability on the 100MHz TIC but detracts from the averaging" (My interpretation), this almost suggests to me that a small amount of noise modulation which of course would be random, controlled, and not biassed in a way to affect the accuacy of the driving, should be added to the 100MHz TIC OCXO. Would that counter the problems on uncharacterised drifting and still allow long averaging.?? Maybe even a slow unsynchonised low frequeny sine wave FM would achieve the same effect. It would seem this would be better than relying on processes which are unknown and not controlled to provide the effect.It is counter intuitive to intentionally degrade a "standard" in some respects but has been shown to work in some cases.
Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: Dr Bruce Griffiths <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Tom Van Baak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <[email protected]> Sent: 21 July 2007 00:16 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Metastability in a 100 MHz TIC _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
