Mike S escribió: > > I suppose it's a religious issue, but I have always preferred > Motorola-style (MOS, Microchip), instruction sets (more orthogonal) and > mnemonics to Intel-style ones (Atmel). It makes more sense (at least in > English) to say "put the bread on the table," than "put on the table > the bread." > > And don't get me started about linear addressing and memory I/O > (Motorola) vs. butt-ugly segmented addressing (Intel). > > > Exactly the two reasons that made me say '6805 and 6811 were fun' and 'I did not liked the 8051 at that time' :)
Regards, Javier -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Javier Herrero EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] HV Sistemas S.L. PHONE: +34 949 336 806 Los Charcones, 17A FAX: +34 949 336 792 19170 El Casar - Guadalajara - Spain WEB: http://www.hvsistemas.com _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
