Thank you for your ideas,
 
It will be good for me to go thou the process of improvement one step at a 
time, I have several steps to try that should keep me busy, I expect to make 
several prototypes and with some luck try several methods. I do need to 
bootstrap my self up as I have to develop my tools as I go. Using one prototype 
to debug the next. My first goal will be to produce a crude counter and see how 
far I can push it. I have the freedom to fail as this is a hobby for me.
 
A few of my replies to the list went to the individual and not the group, this 
was a pilot error, sorry. 
 
Thanks again to all who help,
 
Stanley
 



----- Original Message ----
From: Pete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 11:30:38 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 5 MHZ PIC PPS Divider?

Stanley,

Sometimes I get tunnel vision by looking for 
easy answers in "big box" solutions.

Your 1GHz clock solution may be a simpler
approach for 1ns resolution & provide a
straightforward result. The ECL part you've
selected seems to simplify interfacing with
its synchronous enables.

Perhaps interpolation could be used to 
enhance resolution if 1ns isn't adequate.

Pete Rawson 

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to