Stanley Reynolds wrote: > Block diagram of using a modified version of the DO controllers to compare > several disciplined oscillators. The single logging PC could be several PCs > as a way to have enough serial ports. > http://i307.photobucket.com/albums/nn306/stanleyreynolds/planB.jpg > This scheme is fatally flawed.
1) The various GPSDOs will only be statistically independent for short averaging times. 2) For such short averaging times the monitoring scheme has inadequate resolution unless the short term stability of the oscillators is very poor. Without an independent standard of accurately known frequency such intercomparisons can only measure the relative short term instabilities of the various oscillators. The errors of the various GPSDOs cannot be determined without access to a primary standard. Common View and All in View GPS code and GPS carrier phase measurements may be used to compare the long term performance of the GPSDOs with a primary standard if someone with a primary standard is logging the same data using their primary standard and making it available. For short term relative stability measurements a much higher resolution scheme is required. The SNR is likely to be sufficiently high to permit picosecond or even subpicosecond measurement of the relative phases of the various oscillator outputs. Bruce _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
