> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Magnus Danielson > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 3:05 PM > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt stability and ambient temperature > > Chuck Harris skrev: > > Joseph M Gwinn wrote: > > > >>> That is only 0.54 cal/cc C compared to water with a figure of 1.0. > >>> So water still has greater merit as a thermal buffer. > >>> Cheers, Neville Michie > >> > >> Yep. But it's runny. > >> > >> I have a modest proposal to combine the benefits of water > and silica: > >> We will use wine bottles in the bottom of the cooler as thermal > >> masses. Sadly, any bottle showing any signs of leakage whatsoever > >> will have to be replaced, the leaking bottle being > uncorked and the > >> contents tested. At length. > > > > Hear! Hear! > > > > I vote for a continuous cycle of testing. We dare not > allow even the > > beginnings of a leak to appear. > > > > I volunteer as chief tester. > > I agree. Finally a sound solution I can live with. Naturally > we need to sample several bottles to ensure the proper > quality level and an even and good temper over each session. >
One might wish to be careful about this process. If the time-nut leading you to the temperature controlled chamber is named Montressor, and the first bottle you sample is Medoc, and he keeps commenting on the efflorescence on the walls,... _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
