Lux, Jim (337C) wrote:
A *much* more effective and cheap strategy is a repeater jammer.. Receive
the signal and retransmit it: two antennas and an amplifier. The victim sees
the delayed retransmitted signal at a higher level than the direct one. It's
sort of like creating fake multipath interference. No need for PN
generators, oscillators, etc.

The delay attack is known (it's actually more of a spoofing attack), but most jamming uses just simple CW or noise signals. A problem with the delay attack is that you have a risc of creating a feedback loop which creates an unstable oscillation, which may or may not be what you would like. Among other things, directional finding on an oscillation is much easier than the delayed signal. However, a good hint is to use a directional L1 antenna and point it to the signal and just hook a receiver up and the position you have is that of the attackers antenna. Again that reveals the position. I guess this is why the attack isn't particularly used.

Granted, a smart receiver that *understands* the relationship between SV to
user geometry and doppler can beat it (because the carrier phase and PN
phase of the repeated signal won't be consistent with the geometry), but the
run of the mill PN tracking loop probably won't.

Actually, even the simpler receivers has some resistance to it, the higher amplitude is the main problem.

Most inexpensive receivers use a single bit sampler, so a suitable CW tone
could also probably jam it effectively, but might require some knowledge of
the victim receiver to pick an appropriate frequency (i.e. You'd need to
know the sampling rate.)

The CW attack is well known and has been analyzed fairly deeply. You don't need the sampling rate to make it efficient. The one-bit receiver is dead in the sea compared to even 1.5 bit receivers with suitable AGC loop detection.

Cheers,
Magnus

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to