> In message <[email protected]>, Magnus Danielson > writes: >>[email protected] wrote: > >>L1, L2, L3, L4 and L5 jammers is off the shelf. Not particular >>efficient, not to speak of L3 and L4 being of no significant use. > > Not to mention the fact that there is a good probability that > GPS and Galileo will jam each other, degrading both signals more > than the benefit of having twice as many birds will be able to > compensate for... >
There has been rather elaborate studies conducted on Galileo signals disturbing GPS and vice versa. The chosen/negotiated signals give minimal interference to others. There has been bilateral agreements reached between all (?) future global GNSS-systems. I think unintentional jamming between the systems are unlikely. An unintentional mishap like the recent GPS-L5 debacle is ofcause a possibility. -- Björn _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
