[email protected] wrote:
In message <[email protected]>, Magnus Danielson
writes:
[email protected] wrote:
L1, L2, L3, L4 and L5 jammers is off the shelf. Not particular
efficient, not to speak of L3 and L4 being of no significant use.
Not to mention the fact that there is a good probability that
GPS and Galileo will jam each other, degrading both signals more
than the benefit of having twice as many birds will be able to
compensate for...
There has been rather elaborate studies conducted on Galileo signals
disturbing GPS and vice versa. The chosen/negotiated signals give minimal
interference to others.
The BOC signal approach has been agreed upon.
There has been bilateral agreements reached between all (?) future global
GNSS-systems. I think unintentional jamming between the systems are
unlikely.
Besides, considering similar signal strength, the VCA would not be
significantly affected if at all while the coding gain would reduce the
other signals. Also consider that dopplers isn't make perfect matches
and that BOC signals and C/A does not correlate while BOC signals can
have better coding gain.
An unintentional mishap like the recent GPS-L5 debacle is ofcause a
possibility.
I think they learned the hard way from that bird. Then again, it does
one of its intended missions, preserve the L5 allocation with ITU, so
that part of the mission is good. Javad says they can overcome the bias
error.
Cheers,
Magnus
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
