Hi

I suspect that I will wind up with at least one dead rubidium in the course of 
all this ...

Bob


On Dec 24, 2009, at 10:19 PM, Bruce Griffiths wrote:

> If you do that and it is mu metal then you'll have to demagnetise it.
> However this is easier than having to anneal it.
> If you have a magnetic probe you may be able to test its effectiveness in 
> shielding against the earth's magnetic field.
> This may be one way of checking if a mu metal case needs to be annealed as a 
> result of rough handling.
> 
> If you have a dead rubidium then magnetising the case isn't an issue.
> 
> Bob Camp wrote:
>> Hi
>> 
>> I'd check the case with a magnet, but I'm not real sure that it would not do 
>> something permanent.
>> 
>> Bob
>> 
>> On Dec 24, 2009, at 9:09 PM, Bruce Griffiths wrote:
>> 
>>   
>>> Yes, dont start drilling or punching extra holes in the case as some have 
>>> done, unless you are sure the case isn't mu metal or similar.
>>> 
>>> Optical interrogation of the resonance using lasers would make it much 
>>> easier to separate the electronics from the absorption cell, it would also 
>>> allow the rubidium lamp to be dispensed with.
>>> However this method can be expensive and it has its own problems to solve.
>>> 
>>> Bruce
>>> 
>>> Bob Camp wrote:
>>>     
>>>> Hi
>>>> 
>>>> I certainly agree that, say potting the circuit board, would be a lot 
>>>> easier than some of the stuff we have been talking about.
>>>> 
>>>> My main concern about tearing up the unit is impacting the magnetic 
>>>> shielding. I assume that the outer enclosure forms part of the magnetic 
>>>> shield (at least that's what the data sheets say ...).
>>>> 
>>>> Bob
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Dec 24, 2009, at 7:51 PM, Magnus Danielson wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>       
>>>>> Bob Camp wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>         
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>> The original intent was to simply take an existing "cheap" rubidium and 
>>>>>> do simple things to it. Tearing it into pieces and redesigning parts of 
>>>>>> it was not anything I originally contemplated. The tight integration of 
>>>>>> the physics package to the electronics would make this a fairly involved 
>>>>>> process.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>           
>>>>> Well, the main point with that was that while passive temperature 
>>>>> stability craze have been raving high here, and into more and more 
>>>>> expensive and elaborate propositions, relative simple changes (not 
>>>>> without its challenges) would change the equation (amount of heat to cool 
>>>>> of) quite noticeably. If money was no object, building 
>>>>> no-compromise/prisoners temperature stabilization scehemes around used 
>>>>> commercial rubidiums should not be the optimum way to go. Building a 
>>>>> Rubidum or Cesium fointain would probably be way better use of the money. 
>>>>> Quite a different project thought.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Maybe we need to get back to doable levels, and also consider what 
>>>>> changes Rb frequency, why and what can we do to avoid it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have been dipping my nose into the literature, to refresh myself on the 
>>>>> complex interactions. Lamp intensity in itself is a fashinating topic, 
>>>>> while the filtering cells temperature to intensity dependence is another 
>>>>> little complex field of its own and that (as I suspected) intensity too 
>>>>> pulls the frequency. Oh, and after a quick glaze, I found that the 
>>>>> necessary side-peaks needed for servo of C-field exists for Rb-87, so it 
>>>>> can be done similar to that of Cesium.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Magnus
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>>>>> To unsubscribe, go to 
>>>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>         
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>>>> To unsubscribe, go to 
>>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>       
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe, go to 
>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>> 
>>>     
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>> 
>>   
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
> 


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to