On 1/10/10 9:24 AM, "J.D. Bakker" <[email protected]> wrote: > IHNTA, but... > >> [...] readable by a causal bystander. > > ...is one of the most apropos typoes I've ever seen. Indeed... But it could be right, eh? After all, something in the past led them to look at the clock and attempt to read it? > > JDB. > [whose customers are often pushing for acausal filters] > Acausal? Or non-causal? Or "reverse causal" (anticausal) _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
- Re: [time-nuts] Non electrical time-nutt... Lux, Jim (337C)
- Re: [time-nuts] Non electrical time-nuttery Thomas A. Frank
- Re: [time-nuts] Non electrical time-nuttery Bob Camp
- Re: [time-nuts] Non electrical time-nuttery Bill Hawkins
- Re: [time-nuts] Non electrical time-nuttery Bob Camp
- Re: [time-nuts] Non electrical time-nuttery Lux, Jim (337C)
- Re: [time-nuts] Non electrical time-nuttery Mike Naruta AA8K
- Re: [time-nuts] Non electrical time-nuttery Hal Murray
- Re: [time-nuts] Non electrical time-nuttery J.D. Bakker
- Re: [time-nuts] Non electrical time-nuttery Lux, Jim (337C)
- Re: [time-nuts] Non electrical time-nuttery J.D. Bakker
- Re: [time-nuts] Non electrical time-nuttery gsteinba52
