No; so far, everyone (including myself) has had to rely on Mark's generous and informative tech support. :)
-- john > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]on > Behalf Of SAL CORNACCHIA > Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 7:41 AM > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Modified Total Deviation calculation > > > Hi John Miles, > > Is there an instruction manual available for LadyHeather to > interpret the displayed values like PPS, and other values. > Thank You for making such valuable software available to everyone. > Best regards, > > Sal C. Cornacchia > Electronic RF Microwave Engineer (Ret.) > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Magnus Danielson <[email protected]> > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > <[email protected]> > Sent: Thu, January 21, 2010 5:39:05 AM > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Modified Total Deviation calculation > > John Miles wrote: > >> John Miles wrote: > >>> If you'd like to make the C source available, I'll look at building an > >>> incremental version...? > >> If you can accept the current quick-hack state of the code (yes, I am > >> not too proud of the cleanness, so no comments about coding > style or the > >> general uglyness), find it attached. The main goal of this code is > >> correctness. Find it attached. > >> > >> I'll hacking away further. > >> > >> An incremental version is a trivial extention for MTOTDEV as the outer > >> loop steps the 3*m sample window over the data-samples... > > > > Thanks very much, Magnus -- this code will come in handy. I > should be able > > to get an incremental version into the next TI.CPP beta. > > My intention was to create incremental versions later on. Most of > these allow for incremental versions, so it should not be too > hard. Do use the test-sequence and check against the listed > values so that you know that the algorithm does what you think it > does. Verify your implementations! > > I've implemented the Theo-variants, MTIE and TIErms also. But I > have not verified them as there is no correct values. > > In the process I'e discovered an error in SP1065 relating to Time > Total Variance (and thus Deviation). The factor of tau^3/3 should > be tau^2/3. > The author was unaware of it, confirmed it and forwarded the info > such that next printing can be correct. > > Cheers, > Magnus > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
