Chris Caudle wrote:
No discussion on the new Al based atomic clock paper from NIST?
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0911/0911.4527v2.pdf
"Here we describe an Al+ ion clock with an inaccuracy of 8.6×10−18."
Doesn't get more nutty than that.
Not matching any of my counters all that well... 1,121 PHz with about 8
mHz of line-width. No wonder they had an elaborate mix-down setup just
to compare the clocks.
Cheers,
Magnus
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
