Hi A mixing scheme 20 years in the making ....
Bob On Feb 6, 2010, at 9:49 AM, Magnus Danielson wrote: > Chris Caudle wrote: >> No discussion on the new Al based atomic clock paper from NIST? >> http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0911/0911.4527v2.pdf >> "Here we describe an Al+ ion clock with an inaccuracy of 8.6×10−18." >> Doesn't get more nutty than that. > > Not matching any of my counters all that well... 1,121 PHz with about 8 mHz > of line-width. No wonder they had an elaborate mix-down setup just to compare > the clocks. > > Cheers, > Magnus > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
