[email protected] said: > I vaguely remember reading that pulsars have some fantastic stability > like 1E-20. I don't remember how they established this.
Do you remember how long ago you read that? It might have been some handwaving back before they had good data. For a while, the astronomers were seriously trying to take back the official clock from the physicists. They didn't make it. I think a lot of the interest started when somebody discovered a pulsar ticking at close to 1 KHz. That was in 1982. They have collected enough data to see things like star-quakes which are glitches in the rotation rate due to geologic type shifts similar to the recent discussion of 1.26 microseconds per day from the Chile quake. They decay by gravitational radiation and speed up when accretion adds more momentum and energy. Scientists predict pulsar starquakes June 5, 2006 http://www.lanl.gov/news/index.php/fuseaction/home.story/story_id/8528 Middleditch and his team have discovered that for one particular pulsar, named PSR J0537-6910, the time until the next quake is proportional to the size of the last quake. Using this simple formula, the scientists have been able to aim NASA's Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer at the pulsar a few days before a quake to watch the event unfold. [A fun read.] -- These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
