When I said the feed would work, I was meaning it would work if LHC. The illustrations and text imply you could just place a normal GPS receiver at the feed location, but the polarization would be wrong.

John  WA4WDL

--------------------------------------------------
From: "jmfranke" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 9:32 PM
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPS backup for the stationary time and frequencyuser

You are correct. The dish feed should be LHC. The feed would work for WAAS or other GPS satellites while in the beam pattern, but reject satellites seen through spill over, etc.

John  WA4WDL
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Magnus Danielson" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 9:28 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPS backup for the stationary time and frequency user

On 10/08/2010 03:02 AM, Robert Harmon wrote:
Saw this interesting article several years ago about using an 18 inch dish
pointed at a WAAS satellite:

http://www.freqelec.com/gps_gnss/waas_for_telecom_wp_5-06.pdf

Notice footnote 12 (on page 9).

Will not a standard GPS antenna have the wrong circular polarisation when looking into the mirror image of the offset antenna?

I would expect the thing to work due to antenna gain and leakage in the wrong antenna mode. Ah well...

Cheers,
Magnus

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to