On 01/19/2011 04:17 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
Hi:

Here's a response I got from Symmetricom:

· The SA.45s actually uses cesium, not rubidium. But it is a vapor-cell
clock just like our Rb clocks.

Which is apparent from papers published over time.

· The Tx and Rx pins are for an RS-232 interface. Using the interface,
the clock can be programmed, and the clock’s functions can be monitored.
I have attached a User’s Guide that describes all the commands in detail.

It's didn't make it through. Toss it my way and I toss it on the web.

· The SA.45s does not attempt to correct the 1 PPS input, nor does it
use a sawtooth to correct itself to the 1 PPS input. Instead, it can be
commanded (see User’s Guide) to discipline itself to the 1 PPS input.
How fast it does this is a function of user-selected bandwidth inputs.

Slap a GPS receiver on top of it and a small micro-controller to interface to them both and you have one compact solution and really nice hold-over properties for its size and power.

I get the feeling that a vapor cell is not an absolute standard but
rather works like a Rb vapor cell, i.e. the frequency has some drift and
the starting frequency depends on how the cell was made.

You *will* have wall-pulling effects, to some degree compensated by the buffer gas and also the laser amplitude will cause a pulling effect.

This is a secondary standard and not a primary standard. Compare it up against telecom rubidiums for a more suitable size, power and performance matchup. This is not to discredit it, but rather put it in the right context.

The 1 PPS output can be synchronized (using the 1 PPS input) to the
nearest 10 MHz zero crossing (i.e. to within 50 ns). With a continuously
applied 1 PPS input after some time it will adjust both the frequency
and 1 PPS output to about 5E-13.

Not bad.

Cheers,
Magnus

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to