At 09:45 AM 2/2/2011, jimlux wrote...
what was interesting is that the jamming/fail to get fix was at a closer distance for the consumer receiver than for the FAA approved receiver for aircraft. Maybe it's better signal processing in the (presumably newer) consumer receiver.
Or maybe they modelled terrestrial attenuation (buildings/trees/terrain) of the interfering signal for the consumer unit, but assumed line-of-sight for the aviation one. That would more closely mimic real world usage conditions.
_______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
