I'll add that for some reason the discussion never morphed over to an alternate list created just to discuss a counter project without taking up bandwidth here. Not sure that there was enough interest.
Other Bob On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Bob Camp <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > The polls ran for less than a day before they drew considerable fire for > using too much bandwidth. Since we still had several steps to go (what to > design, what to design it with, and who to design what), it was dropped. > Doing a group general purpose FPGA based timing board isn't going to happen > within the perceived bandwidth limits here. > > Bob > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Tijd Dingen > Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2011 5:04 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [time-nuts] Results parts selection + commercial assembly poll? > > Incidentally, did something ever come of these two polls? I was trying find > the conclusion / results, but could not find it on the list. Entirely > possible that I am blind for which I apologize in advance. Anyone know what > came of it? > > regards, > Fred > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
