why reply at all?
________________________________ From: Poul-Henning Kamp <[email protected]> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement <[email protected]> Sent: Thu, July 14, 2011 8:00:43 AM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] List Noise Level [was...] In message <cany2ixooqetude05ikthemp3ghs2sqcgmbpopas+vn4wtw+...@mail.gmail.com> , "William H. Fite" writes: >Like this polemic didn't worsen the S/N ratio? If you take a clue from it, it will improve the S/N ratio. Seeing that you sent a 1-line reply, quoting the entire message, in a discussion about S/N ratio does not give me high hopes however, and I will happily be the first to move that you get thrown off the list, if you don't acquire clue rapidly. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
