If they will not observe the leap seconds as the earth times calibration, it would become unusable in some areas of technology, and or earth time in itself, or I would think. When the first cesium clock was being built, it was to be calibrated, I guess one could say, by the astronomical second, which was calculated by the US Naval Observatory at that time. In other words, they used that astronomical second to determine the frequency of resonance of cesium. Since the two times don't run paralell due to the earths rotational differences, as of now, and compared to then, why would they not want to correct it? I would think it would screw everything up over years and years of time.
Best, Will *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 7/15/2011 at 1:06 AM Javier Herrero wrote: >With Bulletin C nr 42, a link to a questionnarie about it is added at >the end (and I think that leap seconds and its convenience or not has >been discussed lots of times in the list :) > > From Bulletin C 42: > >IMPORTANT: After years of discussions, a proposal to fundamentally redefine >UTC will come to a conclusive vote in January 2012 at the ITU-R in Geneva. > >This proposal would halt the intercalary adjustments known as leap seconds >that maintain UTC as a form of Universal Time. > >The Earth Orientation Center of the IERS organizes a survey online with the >objective to find out the strength of opinion for maintaining or changing >the present system. > >Link to the questionnaire: > >http://hpiers.obspm.fr/eop-pc/index.php?index=questionnaire > >Your response is appreciated before 30 August 2011 > > > >El 15/07/2011 00:51, [email protected] escribió: >> Unless I'm missing something, it seems to me that this matter has not yet been discussed among time-nuts: >> http://futureofutc.org >> > From the above website: >> A conclusive proposal to fundamentally redefine UTC is scheduled for a vote by the Radiocommunications Assembly of the ITU-R in January, 2012. The proposal will halt the contribution of so-called leap seconds to UTC after 2017, and will also terminate the requirement that time services transmit the difference between UT1 and UTC. If approved, UTC would no longer be useful as a type of Universal Time for most technical applications. >> Antonio I8IOV >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] >To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >and follow the instructions there. > >__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5851 (20110206) __________ > >The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > >http://www.eset.com _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
