Hi Poul-Henning, Nice article. One thing stands out to me, though: How do you propose knowing 20 years in advance the schedule of leap seconds?
Or, are you proposing that we just collect all seconds that may occur in 20 years, and dump them into a single correction, one that may be multi-second? I notice that this subject seems to make you a little grumpier than the Poul-Henning I am used to. I hope I am not treading on ground you feel already is too well covered. -Chuck Harris Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message<4e1ffa88.9050...@sfr.fr>, cook michael writes: Michael, there are a few details you overlook, and rather than repeat myself, I'll point you at an article I wrote for Queue and Communications of The ACM, trying to lay out the bits: http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1967009
_______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
