Michael Sokolov, I do not mean to be disrespectful, but this list is not about creating time scales or having argumentative threads about such mundane things as leap seconds in and of themselves. I feel that you have crossed the argument from one thread to another for a purpose that is not consistent with this thread. Need I point out that your nemeses has wisely ignored your onslaught out of both respect for the low noise level intent of this list and also because the subject matter does not, properly, belong on this list.
I am going to ask that you respect this position and take your problems back to the list that is centered on that subject matter. Or from another perspective, you could create your very own list server and call it Time-Scales which would seem to be much more appropriate. In either case I know myself and others are not interested in this pattern of behavior and the endless responses that will occur. Should you find this a bit troubling allow me to quote a line from a very famous movie: Quite frankly my dear, I dont give a damn. Bill....WB6BNQ Michael Sokolov wrote: > Hello again, > > I have just written up the formal spec for the UTR timescale which I'm > seeking to implement on my "rubber duckie" timekeeping apparatus which I > had discussed here earlier this week, and I have released the first > draft for review: > > http://ifctfvax.Harhan.ORG/timekeeping/draft-utrspec.txt > http://ifctfvax.Harhan.ORG/timekeeping/draft-utrdef.txt > > Hopefully it will clarify exactly what I am after and why I'm doing it. > > MS > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
