Hello Bernard, I can understand your feelings. My response was measured from the start of the subject matter, which, admittedly, was a different thread on this list. It did not start out well to say the least. Clearly, this matter is a touchy subject from another list with a history all its own. As such bringing it to another list is not good etiquette, especially when it is off topic on this list.
73....Bill....WB6BNQ f1ehx wrote: > Bonjour, > Vous vous foutez peut être du sujet de notre ami, mais ce sujet est > respectable, ne serait-ce que par le travail qu'il a impliqué. > Mais qui voit votre remontrance ne peut s'empècher de bondir à la sauvagerie > de votre réponse en directe sur la liste. > Je croyais être entre "gens bien", je vois qu'il y a aussi des sauvages sur > cette liste, > Adieu ! > > Bernard. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "WB6BNQ" <[email protected]> > To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" > <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2011 4:32 AM > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] UTR timescale draft spec > > Michael Sokolov, > > I do not mean to be disrespectful, but this list is not about creating time > scales or having argumentative threads about such mundane things as leap > seconds > in and of themselves. I feel that you have crossed the argument from one > thread > to another for a purpose that is not consistent with this thread. Need I > point > out that your nemeses has wisely ignored your onslaught out of both respect > for > the low noise level intent of this list and also because the subject matter > does > not, properly, belong on this list. > > I am going to ask that you respect this position and take your problems back > to > the list that is centered on that subject matter. Or from another > perspective, > you could create your very own list server and call it "Time-Scales" which > would > seem to be much more appropriate. > > In either case I know myself and others are not interested in this pattern of > behavior and the endless responses that will occur. Should you find this a > bit > troubling allow me to quote a line from a very famous movie: > > "Quite frankly my dear, I don't give a damn." > > Bill....WB6BNQ > > Michael Sokolov wrote: > > > Hello again, > > > > I have just written up the formal spec for the UTR timescale which I'm > > seeking to implement on my "rubber duckie" timekeeping apparatus which I > > had discussed here earlier this week, and I have released the first > > draft for review: > > > > http://ifctfvax.Harhan.ORG/timekeeping/draft-utrspec.txt > > http://ifctfvax.Harhan.ORG/timekeeping/draft-utrdef.txt > > > > Hopefully it will clarify exactly what I am after and why I'm doing it. > > > > MS > > > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > > To unsubscribe, go to > > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
