Paul,

On 16/08/11 02:07, Paul A. Cianciolo wrote:
Magnus,

Now that I have a basic understanding, the way you explained seems just rite.
My lack of even a basic understanding is what led to the confusion.
Sorry if I caused you any  trouble.
I am going to go back and read the article again.

Thank you Magnus

You are welcome. However, I wish that you and anyone else should be able to get the basic understanding from that article, and then be able to pick up more and more of the quirks. I still consider that the article is "work in progress" even if it covers quite some ground by now. It lacks some theoretical analysis aspects, but could be better in depicting some key aspects.

So, for me it is important to find out what was missing for you to "get it".

Cheers,
Magnus

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to