On 12/09/11 08:22, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message<[email protected]>, Mike S writes:
[...] along with ISO
900*, which amounts to "you can make crap, as long as you document it
and try to do better."
ISO9000 has no requirement that you try to do better.
ISO9000's only requires that you can document how crap your wares are,
and that you can document how you determined that.
You can be ISO9000 certified with this QA process:
"Kick a tire, listen for rattling sound, if not too bad
sounding, check 'Inspection OK' box on price-sign".
The only thing you have to document subsequently, is that all cars
had at least one tire kicked.
It isn't a quality framework standard, it is a quality framework
documentation standard. That is at least how I have percieved it. It can
be used for good, unfortunatly it seems this is a rare event... probably
due to quick-fix consultants.
At work we have a process, it is documented internally, but it is not
really the truth and to be honest, there are many details which is far
from the model.
Cheers,
Magnus
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
