nr 2 = nr 3 is an assumption? I was thinking that it is a definition :)
Regards, Javier El 23/09/2011 13:33, Poul-Henning Kamp escribió:
In message<[email protected]>, Javier Herrero writes: BTW: Just something to think about: There are three quantities involved here, and most of the coverage and quite a lot of physicists overlook that: 1. Speed of neutrinos 2. Speed of photons 3. Constant 'c' From relativity. Until now the assumption have been that 2 = 3, but this is only an assumption, based on the fact that we had no measurements that said otherwise. If 1> 3, as most press-coverage seems to posit, because they forgot the above is an assumption, then both the standardmodel and relativity is in trouble. If 3>= 1> 2, then only the standard model is in trouble, relativity unaffected.
_______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
