On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Bill Dailey <[email protected]> wrote:
> The complicating factor here is they aren't really sure if neutrinos actually > have mass. Therefore they may not need adhere to the mass portion of > relativity and hence may be more like photons. They won't put forth ANY > suppositions until they are sure they haven't made a mistake. I think we all want these neutrinos to be faster than C (not just faster then photons) because it would be fun to live through a revolution in physics. A simple mis-calculation would be so boring. If I had to bet I'd bet on the boring error that was missed by 100 co-authors. I'd be happy to loose my bet. Can we assume for a minute the result is correct and they really are literally faster than C. What does it mean to be faster than C at this large macroscopic scale of kilometers Fun to guess. Time must be running backwards. Or maybe they have negative mass. If truly faster than C, SOMETHING nonsensical must be true. Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
