On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Magnus Danielson < [email protected]> wrote:
> > I assumed so from the statements relating to time, in particular the PTB > time transfer test proving a 2,3 ns difference. Which still doesn't satisfy > my curiosity. > We still don't have the final PTB report. Here's a preliminary one: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/13409775/ptb_preliminary_report.pdf > > A 60 ns offset between the sites would account for the "missing time". > Similarly a 18 m shorter distance would also account for the "missing > time". Due to the large distance I would start in that end to ensure it > works. > The geodesy effort was led by others. I am told they did things very carefully. > > >>> Do you have direct fiber between the locations? >>> >>> >> You mean between CERN and Gran Sasso? No, but that's certainly something >> we >> could explore for the future. >> > > A fiber-based time-transfer would be nice complementary as it would provide > an independent timing path. Any ideas on how to proceed? This is unknown territory for me. Cheers, Javier _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
