Javier,
On 10/25/2011 07:50 PM, Javier Herrero wrote:
El 25/10/2011 18:39, Magnus Danielson escribió:
The traditional formula would not make a speed difference due to the
sign of the mass, but imaginary mass would. That would be a bit of
extrapolation out of a single formula. Then again, so much of the
quantum world is a mix of read and imaginary numbers, so why not an
odd mass case. That would however change a lot, but it would indeed
keep the theoretical physics occupied quite a bit. That's the
definition of the experimental physics work-description... find out
things for the theorists to figure out... :)
And an imaginary mass would imply and imaginary energy (in the sense of
complex number with no real part... :) ) and that would imply also that
lower energy neutrinos (in module value) would be faster. Sounds fun :)
Exactly, remember where you heard it first ;)
Once the imaginary axis is introduced, you can also expect complex
numbers for mass. But really, it is not the explanation I would expect
to turn out true.
So, we have at least two neutrino-machines to verify the time on. But
really, I would not expect that we would provide evidence which the
world of physics would accept, but possibly provide a report giving
sufficient insight on how these things works. Mostly because it would be
a good opportunity to explain it to fellow time-nuts.
Cheers,
Magnus
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
