Yes, I remember that thread. Anyway, Hal, are you suggesting to use the 3.2GHz clock to crank up the counting speed? OK, strange, but can be a way...
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Bob Camp <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > There was a point in time where a general purpose board could have been > done on a group basis. The discussion of that offended some on the list. > That prevented it from being done in a timely manner. The funds that would > have gone to the project went to a closed design that is not available. > > Sorry about that. > > Bob > > > > On Dec 6, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Attila Kinali <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 17:06:43 -0500 > > "Bob Camp" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> It's the "wave union" one that the Fermi labs papers talk about. We > started > >> talking about a group design on one a while back. Ultimately it got > taken > >> off list .... > > > > What is the status of that? > > I would try to help if i didnt know that i have way too > > little time currently :-( > > > > Attila Kinali > > -- > > Why does it take years to find the answers to > > the questions one should have asked long ago? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
