On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:37:02 -0600 Joseph Gray <[email protected]> wrote:
> http://www.news.com.au/technology/sci-tech/nucelar-clock-100-times-more-accurate-than-atomic-clock/story-fn5fsgyc-1226297068083#ixzz1osFDYtyb > > I didn't see a link to a more detailed article. This one tells you > almost nothing. See the thread starting at [1] and especially [2] for a "discussion". Attila Kinali [1] http://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2012-March/064837.html [2] http://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2012-March/064884.html -- Why does it take years to find the answers to the questions one should have asked long ago? _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
