Thanks. I missed that discussion. Sometimes, when messages don't look immediately interesting, or when they stray way off topic, I'm prone to delete without reading :-) At times the list is very quiet and at other times too busy to keep up with.
Joe Gray W5JG On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Attila Kinali <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:37:02 -0600 > Joseph Gray <[email protected]> wrote: > >> http://www.news.com.au/technology/sci-tech/nucelar-clock-100-times-more-accurate-than-atomic-clock/story-fn5fsgyc-1226297068083#ixzz1osFDYtyb >> >> I didn't see a link to a more detailed article. This one tells you >> almost nothing. > > See the thread starting at [1] and especially [2] for a "discussion". > > Attila Kinali > [1] http://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2012-March/064837.html > [2] http://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2012-March/064884.html > > -- > Why does it take years to find the answers to > the questions one should have asked long ago? > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
